论文部分内容阅读
5月8日,中国驻南斯拉夫大使馆突遭以美国为首的北约袭击,全国各种传媒迅即连日密集报道,形成声势浩大的“新闻潮”。特别是日报占尽先机,武汉的《长江日报》、《武汉晨报》、《楚天都市报》等力作频出、佳构叠现,引起强烈反响。面对这样举世关注的重大突发事件,时效差、刊期长的周报或周刊该不该作出反应?能不能有所作为? 5月8日是星期六,当周的各周报均已出版,而待下周再有动作,势头和热度显然大打折扣,新闻资源的利用也受到制约,很难与日报一争短长。确实,有的周报便按部就班,常规发稿。更多的周报则设法扬长避短,或尽力拼抢,或后发制人,也有不逊日报的出彩
On May 8, the Chinese embassy in Yugoslavia suddenly made a NATO attack led by the United States. Various kinds of media in the country immediately reported in an intensive and intensive manner to form a massive “news wave.” In particular, the daily newspapers take the lead, Wuhan’s “Changjiang Daily”, “Wuhan Morning Post”, “Chutian Metropolis Daily” and other masterpieces frequent, studios stacked, aroused strong repercussions. In the face of such major emergencies of global concern, time-sensitive, long periodical weekly or weekly should react and can make a difference? Saturday, May 8, the week weekly newspapers have been published, and To be action next week, the momentum and the heat is obviously greatly reduced, the use of news resources are also subject to constraints, it is difficult to compete with the Daily Mail short. Indeed, some weekly newspapers have been working step-by-step on a regular basis. More weekly papers try to avoid weaknesses, or try to scraping, or post-whistle-blowers, but also out of print