论文部分内容阅读
1944年,《万象》杂志发表了傅雷的著名评论文章《论张爱玲的小说》。“深刻又中肯”的该文,不但被张爱玲撰文予以反驳,而且被不喜欢张爱玲的满涛撰文“痛骂”。关于傅雷与满涛围绕张爱玲小说的文艺交锋,至今鲜有分析探讨。然而,若立足满涛的批评焦点,细读二人的评论文章,对照《约翰·克利斯朵夫》,不难发现“痛骂”背后的“约翰·克利斯朵夫”审美趣味以及傅雷文章字里行间的“约翰·克利斯朵夫”因子。这样,既有助于理解满涛何以“痛骂”傅雷,又可以探讨“痛骂”之得失,学理审视文艺评论,正视文学作品的歧义性,营造良好评论生态。
In 1944, Vientiane magazine published Fu Lei’s famous commentary “On Zhang Ailing’s Novels.” “Deep and pertinent ” The article, not only be etiquette to be etiquette by Zhang Ailing, but also do not like Zhang Ailing Man Tao author “scolding ”. There has scarcely been analyzed and discussed the literary and artistic confrontation between Fu Lei and Man Tao about the novels of Zhang Ailing. However, based on the critical focus of Man Tao and the careful reading of the two commentary articles, it is not difficult to find out the “John Krisdorff” aesthetic behind “scolding” by contrasting with “John Krisdorff” Interest and the “John Krisdorff” factor between the lines in Fu Lei’s essay. In this way, it helps to understand why Manchuria scolded Fu Lei and explores the pros and cons of scolding and examines the literary criticism, examines the ambiguity of literary works and creates a good ecology of comments.