編輯同志:我們語文課的楊老師,備課找的「材料」也確實不少,但一把那些材料搬上課堂,就顯得庸俗,甚至牛頭不對馬嘴。講到新婚姻法,他硬扯些什麼「寫情書」的淫穢故事。談到保爾·柯察金的戀愛問题,便說:「在舊社會裏男子樂找個資產階級的小姐,具有無產階級的思想;同樣,女子樂找個知識分子,具有革命的品質」這種說法根本不合實際,一點沒有意義。有時候同學寫了很荒謬的文章,如說「生產節約,死人最合乎這個道理,因為人 Comrade editor: Teacher Yang in our language class also has quite a lot of “materials” for preparing lessons. However, when those materials are put on the classroom, they become vulgar and even misleading. When it comes to the new marriage law, he hurled some obscene story of “writing a love letter.” Turning to Paul Kozhajin’s love affair, he said: “In the old society, the man finds a bourgeois lady with a proletarian ideology. Similarly, a woman enjoys an intellectual quality and has revolutionary qualities.” There is no point in saying that is not practical at all. Sometimes students write absurd articles, such as "saving production, the dead most suitable for this truth, because people