论文部分内容阅读
笔者曾对油隔泵的生产实践做过有关统计,认为油隔泵与活塞泵相比,是有一定的优越性和经济效益的。但据有关杂志介绍,油隔泵与其它泵相比在输送其它矿浆方面,仍有一定差距。特别是在油耗和易磨损部件运行周期方面差距较大。这可能与输送矿浆的性质不同及泵的几何尺寸不完全相似有关。1.油隔泵与活塞泵的比较根据油隔泵与活塞泵生产运行对比统计,油隔泵的运行周期几乎是活塞泵的10倍,详见
The author once made statistics about the production practice of the oil-in-place pump and thinks that the oil-in-place pump has some advantages and economic benefits compared with the piston pump. However, according to relevant magazine introduction, there is still a certain gap between oil pump and other pumps in conveying other pulp. In particular, there is a large gap between the fuel consumption and the wear cycle of the wearing parts. This may be due to the nature of the transported slurry and the pump geometry is not completely similar. 1. Comparison of oil pump and piston pump According to the production of oil pump and piston pump operating statistics, the oil pump operating cycle is almost 10 times the piston pump, see