本文首先对管制性征收的起源作了介绍,然后讨论了美国宪法保护的财产及其范围,最后阐述了美国判例法中管制性征收的界定标准及其演变。本文得出结论认为,美国关于管制性征收的判例法在确保宪法对个人财产权的强有力的保护的前提下,经历了一个从单纯强调个人所有权、漠视环境等公共利益,到适当考虑政府保护环境等公共利益的措施的正当性的转变。 This article first introduces the origin of the regulatory expropriation, and then discusses the assets protected by the U.S. Constitution and its scope. Finally, it elaborates the definition of the regulatory expropriation in the American case law and its evolution. This article concludes that under the premise of ensuring the constitutional protection of individual property rights, the case law of the United States on regulatory expropriation has undergone a period of transition from simply emphasizing individual ownership and disregarding the public interest in the environment to giving due consideration to the government’s environmental protection Such as public interest measures of legitimacy change.