论文部分内容阅读
一年一度的电影“金鸡奖”评选结束了,一部震撼多少人心灵的军事体裁影片《花环》却落了选,不禁使人感到迷惘,尤其对部队干战来说,就更不解其妙所在。看了“金鸡奖”评委们不给《花环》戴桂冠的意见有三点:一是说影片前半部是轻喜剧式、后半部是悲剧式的,节奏上,风格上不够统一;二是说影片涉及的社会矛盾最后都或多或少地解决了,给人回味的“东西”不多;三是说人物理想化、形式化,没有自己的个性。就这三点很值得商榷的意见,竟使一部在广大人民群众中感染力很强、社会反响空前、拷贝争订数最多的影片(除功夫片以外的片子)落选,怎能让人们满意、信服呢?
The selection of the annual “Golden Rooster Award” is over. The military’s “Garland”, which shocked so many souls, has fallen victim to confusion. In particular, it is even more puzzling for the troops fighting the war Wonderful place. Read the “Golden Rooster Award” judges do not give “garland” Dai Guiguan opinion has three points: First, that the first half of the film is a light comedy, the second half is tragic, rhythm, style is not enough unity; the second is that The social contradictions involved in the film are ultimately resolved more or less, giving the aftertaste of “things” not much; third is the idealization of the characters, formal, do not have their own personality. It is debatable on these three points that we can make people satisfied with the unsuccessful election of a film (with the exception of kung fu films) that has the highest appeal among the broad masses of the people and unprecedented social repercussions, Convinced?