《征服丰富性》是费耶阿本德的遗作,本文通过对这本书所包含的理论及思想的全面解读,重新阐述了费耶阿本德关于实在论与相对主义的相关论证。穆内瓦在本文中为费耶阿本德在《征服丰富性》中的哲学立场进行了合理的辩护,尤其是批评了科学对经验所进行的抽象化处理,以及建立在这种抽象化基础上的“实在论”。但是,穆内瓦并不赞同费耶阿本德对于相对主义的理解,他借助生物学的相关理论为自己的观点进行了论证。最终,本文在以上论述的基础上指出了伦理学是衡量科学真理的一个标准,并且提出了关于知识的两种模型。 “Conquering richness” is the remains of Feyerabend. This article re-explains Feyerabend’s argument on realism and relativism through a comprehensive reading of the theories and thoughts contained in this book. Muneva in this article defended Fayabord’s philosophical position in “conquering richness,” in particular criticizing the abstraction of science from experience and building on this basis of abstraction On the “realism”. However, Mu Neiva did not agree with Feyerabend’s understanding of relativism, he used biological theory to demonstrate his point of view. Finally, based on the above discussion, this article points out that ethics is a standard measure of scientific truth and proposes two models of knowledge.