论文部分内容阅读
问:某拍卖公司接受当地高级人民法院的委托,依该院《协助执行通知书》对该地区某块土地使用权及在建工程实施拍卖。在拍卖活动中,拍卖公司完全依照拍卖程序实施拍卖,但竞得拍卖物的竞买人事后却以拍卖公司末告知拍卖物权利瑕疵为由,要求拍卖公司赔偿其损失,后双方为此诉至法院。诉讼过程中,各方对《拍卖法》中竞买人的知情权和拍品权利瑕疵存在争议。为此,请求进一步提供解释,以确保法律的正确实施。
Q: An auction company commissioned by the local higher people’s court, according to the hospital “to assist the implementation of the notice” on the land use rights and the construction of a project in the area of auction. In the auction, the auction company in full accordance with the auction procedures for the implementation of the auction, but competing auction bidders after the auction company was informed of flaws on the grounds that the auctioneer, requiring the auction company to compensate for its losses, after both parties to the court for this complaint . In the process of litigation, all parties dispute the rights of bidders and the defects of the auctioneers’ rights in the Auction Law. To this end, requests for further explanation are provided to ensure the proper application of the law.