论文部分内容阅读
释明主体应同时具有三要素:享有法定的审判权;能以自己名义释明;能独自承担释明的法律后果。只有法院同时具备以上三要素,故法院才是释明的主体。法院的释明权是由享有审判权的具体个人来实施的。具体实施者的合议庭法官及人民陪审员均是以法院名义进行释明,不同诉讼阶段,他们释明的重点及范围各不相同,其中审判长在开庭审理中居于释明主导地位;实际参与案件审理的庭长、院长、审委会委员多是对涉及当事人实体权益,可能影响裁判结果的事项进行释明,他们尤其应注意尊重合议庭或审委会的最终处理结果;参与案件审理的书记员和法官助理,虽然享有部分审理权,但不享有裁判权,他们释明的范围应限定于诉讼程序性事项。
Clarifying that the subject should have three elements at the same time: enjoying the legal jurisdiction; being able to explain in its own name; Only the court at the same time with the above three elements, so the court is the subject of interpretation. The court’s power of interpretation is enforced by the specific individuals who have the right to a trial. The judges of the collegial panels and the people’s jurors of the specific implementers are all explained in the name of the court. At different stages of the proceedings, they explain different focuses and scopes, in which the presiding judge lives in a dominant position in court proceedings. The actual participation cases The trial of the president, dean, the Committee is mostly involved in the entity rights and interests of the parties may affect the outcome of the referee to explain the matter, in particular, they should pay attention to respect the final outcome of the collegial panel or the CRIC; the case involved in the secretary Although the members and judges’ assistants enjoy some of the power of adjudication, they do not have the power of adjudication. Their interpretation should be limited to procedural matters.