论文部分内容阅读
杨慎《升庵集》训诂考据成就显著,也有较为明显的不足之处。其不足主要表现在“训诂考据态度有时较随意,论证难免轻率”、“一方面反对宋儒‘以意解经’,却又不自觉地陷入‘以意解经’的藩篱”、“考据不充分或不注明出处”、“引文明显有误而不作校勘”等方面。今以“青云”、“香球金缕”、“明驼使”、“辟雍非大学”、“白?”为例,略作补正。
Yang Shen “Sheng Um Ji” exegesis test based on evidence of significant achievements, there are more obvious deficiencies. Its shortcomings are mainly manifested in the following aspects: “The attitude of exegesis is sometimes more arbitrary and the argument is inevitable.” On the one hand, it opposes Song Confucianism “to interpret the Scriptures,” but unconsciously falls into the fence of “interpreting Scriptures” , “Test is not sufficient or does not indicate the source ”, “citation is obviously wrong without correction ” and so on. Now with “Albatron ”, “fragrant ball wisp ”, “Ming camel make ”, “set Yongfei university”, “white? ” For example, a little make corrections.