论文部分内容阅读
目的腹腔镜直肠癌根治术与开腹手术术后优势分析比较。方法选取2014年5月到2015年8月于我院治疗直肠癌患者120例,随机分为对照组和观察组每组患者60例,对照组采取常规开腹手术,观察组运用腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术;对比分析两组患者近期疗效情况的比较。结果观察组患者近期疗效情况的比较优于对照组(P<0.05),2组之间的淋巴结清扫数目无较大差异(P>0.05);观察组并发症比例为8.3%,相比于对照组并发症比例16.6%,俩组之间有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论传统开腹手术相与腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术相比较具有创伤小,疼痛轻,术后恢复快,并发症少,总住院时间短等诸多优势,适合在临床中推广运用。
Objective To compare the advantages after laparoscopic radical resection of laparoscopic rectal cancer with laparotomy. Methods 120 patients with rectal cancer treated in our hospital from May 2014 to August 2015 were randomly divided into control group and observation group of 60 patients in each group. The control group was given conventional laparotomy. The observation group received laparoscopic rectal Radical surgery; comparative analysis of two groups of patients with short-term efficacy comparison. Results The curative effect of the observation group was better than that of the control group (P <0.05), there was no significant difference in the number of lymph node dissection between the two groups (P> 0.05). The complication rate in the observation group was 8.3% Complications of the group of 16.6%, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). Conclusion Compared with laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer, traditional laparotomy has many advantages such as less trauma, less pain, quick recovery after operation, fewer complications and shorter total length of hospital stay, which is suitable for clinical application.