论文部分内容阅读
目的分析并评价围术期舒适护理对冠心病介入治疗患者康复效果的影响。方法 124例冠心病介入治疗患者,随机分为实验组及对照组,各62例。实验组给予舒适护理,对照组接受传统的常规护理。对比分析两组患者的康复效果。结果实验组患者术后并发症腹胀、腰背痛、失眠发生例数少于对照组,实验组患者满意度高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(χ~2=7.44、4.03、6.33、3.92,P<0.05)。护理前,两组患者的汉密顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评分比较,差异无统计学意义(t=1.497,P>0.05);护理后,实验组患者的HAMA评分低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(t=13.759,P<0.05)。实验组患者护理后的HAMA评分低于本组护理前,差异有统计学意义(t=10.405,P<0.05);对照组患者护理后的HAMA评分低于本组护理前,但差异无统计学意义(t=1.355,P>0.05)。结论舒适护理有利于冠心病介入治疗患者的健康。
Objective To analyze and evaluate the effect of perioperative comfort nursing on the rehabilitation of patients with coronary heart disease. Methods 124 patients with coronary heart disease interventional treatment were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, 62 cases in each. The experimental group was given comfortable care, while the control group received the traditional routine care. Comparative analysis of two groups of patients rehabilitation effect. Results The incidence of abdominal distension, back pain and insomnia in the experimental group was less than that in the control group. The satisfaction of the experimental group was higher than that in the control group (χ ~ 2 = 7.44, 4.03, 6.33, 3.92, P <0.05). Before nursing, there was no significant difference in HAMA score between the two groups (t = 1.497, P> 0.05). After nursing, the HAMA score of the experimental group was lower than that of the control group Statistical significance (t = 13.759, P <0.05). The HAMA score of the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the group before nursing (t = 10.405, P <0.05). The HAMA score of the control group was lower than that of the group before nursing, but the difference was not statistically significant Significance (t = 1.355, P> 0.05). Conclusion Comfortable nursing is beneficial to the health of patients with coronary heart disease interventional therapy.