论文部分内容阅读
对秦的音乐水平争议较大,历代史官对于秦灭礼乐笔伐不断,《史记》等文献上所记载的秦乐器物也十分落后,部分学者更有秦时无乐的论调。笔者以为,《史记》等文献所涉的记载并不能作为主要例证,且其用意不在于描述秦乐的当时面貌;此外,对于秦乐的历史面貌不仅要依靠文献记载,更要依托考古文物发掘,应该将文献资料与考古文物相互印证方能描述秦乐的真实现状。
There is much controversy over the musical level of Qin. Historians of various histories kept constant demeanor of Qin’s etiquette and ritual music. The instruments of Qin music recorded in the Records of the Historian are also very backward. Some scholars even discussed Qin’s no-music argument. In my opinion, the historical records of the “Historical Records” and other documents do not serve as the main illustration, and its purpose is not to describe the current face of Qin music; In addition, the historical outlook of Qin music depends not only on documentation, but also rely on archaeological excavations , We should confirm the authenticity of Qinle by confirming the documents and archeology together.