目的探讨在小儿急性哮喘急诊护理中应用舒适护理模式的临床效果。方法 64例急性哮喘患儿,根据入院治疗顺序分为对照组与观察组,各32例。对照组给予常规急诊护理,观察组给予舒适护理模式。对两组的护理疗效以及肺功能情况等进行对比。结果观察组总有效率为93.75%,高于对照组的71.88%(P<0.05)。观察组75%潮气量时呼气流速(TEF)为(140.98±21.18)ml/s,50%TEF为(130.53±6.59)ml/s,25%TEF为(106.64±13.74)ml/s,潮气峰值流速与潮气量的比率(PTEF/VT)为(1.59±0.59),优于对照组的(159.78±19.79)、(110.59±7.65)、(81.78±23.20)ml/s及(2.09±0.63),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在小儿急性哮喘急诊护理中应用舒适护理模式护理疗效显著,且有效改善了患儿的肺功能,值得推广。 Objective To investigate the clinical effect of applying comfortable nursing mode in acute pediatric acute asthma care. Methods Sixty-four children with acute asthma were divided into control group and observation group according to the order of hospitalization, with 32 cases in each group. The control group was given routine emergency care and the observation group was given comfortable nursing mode. The two groups of nursing efficacy and lung function were compared. Results The total effective rate in the observation group was 93.75%, which was higher than that in the control group (71.88%, P <0.05). The TEF of the observation group was (140.98 ± 21.18) ml / s at 75% tidal volume, (130.53 ± 6.59) ml / s at 50% TEF and (106.64 ± 13.74) ml / The ratio of peak flow rate to tidal volume (PTEF / VT) was (1.59 ± 0.59), which was significantly higher than that of control group (159.78 ± 19.79), (110.59 ± 7.65), (81.78 ± 23.20) ml / s and (2.09 ± 0.63) , The difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Nursing care in children with acute asthma emergency nursing care mode of care efficacy significantly, and effectively improve the lung function of children, it is worth promoting.