论文部分内容阅读
建设部新政细则出台后,一直惴惴不安的开发商终于可以喘了口气。然而,调控并非就此结束。最近的两周时间里,关于限制外资购房的传言终于得到证实：此前曾在多个城市流传并已渐渐平息的个税传闻也终究不是空穴来风。这两条都可视为调控的后续政策,它们将对楼市产生怎样的影响?此外,北京工商实行的“住宅禁商”政策已一月有余,“住宅禁商”的作用和效应也日渐呈现,并引发了一系列思考,住宅该不该禁商?短期与长期效应分别如何?杭州是否也有相关的政策?关于空置率的讨论一直是业界一个没有定论的话题。针对近期国家统计局公布的数据,业内专家、学者们又开始了一场口水仗,他们的观点如何?能给我们怎样的启示?本期《楼市关注》将分以上四大主题一一详述。
Ministry of Construction after the introduction of the new rules, has been uneasy developers finally breathless. However, regulation does not end here. In the recent two weeks, rumors of restrictions on foreign-home buyers have finally been confirmed: tax rumors that have been circulating in many cities and have gradually subsided are not ultimately groundless. Both of these measures can be regarded as follow-up policies for regulation and control. How will they affect the property market? In addition, the policy of “commercial residence banning” practiced by Beijing business and industry has been more than in January, and the role and effect of “residential bankers” And triggered a series of reflections on whether housing should be banned? What are the short-term and long-term effects? Are there any relevant policies in Hangzhou? The discussion on vacancy rates has been a topic of unsolved debate in the industry. For the recent data released by the National Bureau of Statistics, experts and scholars in the industry started a bickering battle again. What are their views? What kind of enlightenment can be given to us in this issue? The “Market Concern” will be divided into the above four topics .