《道士下山》是部讲“道”的片儿。不过看完整部片,你可能并不会很清楚到底这个故事跟“道”有什么关系。首先他不是关于主角“何安下”的“得道”片,他只是充当了一双眼睛,一个“观察者”;其次片中各大高手和道瓜葛也不大,只是零星提到了一些状态。我猜原本小说可能说的更多些?小说里大概会透过几位高手不同的人生选择,稍微说出些“道”的味道,但电影把这件事总结成了一个道理,就不太对味了。整个片看下来,好像故事和“道”是两张皮,贴合不起来。电影的画面、武打的状态,都是十分精致的,但就是陈导演身上的那种“正统”的劲儿,让我觉得他对“道”的悟性和灵气,确实比较浅,打动不了人,启发性不够。看完电影我就想,这片儿如果是李安来导,应该是截然不同的另一种感觉。当然,我并不赞成比较,每个人都不一样,而且拍电影在我看来真的是非常艰难的一件事。陈导演的《道士下山》拍的美轮美奂,镜头语言纯熟,画面十分漂亮,可是,内核上的弱,也是无法不去谈论的。 “Taoist down the mountain” is the Ministry say “Road” film children. However, if you look at the whole episode, you probably will not know for sure what the story is about. First of all, he is not a film about the protagonist “He Anxia”, he just acts as a pair of eyes, an “observer”, and secondly, the major masters in the film are not big, just Sporadic references some status. I guess the original novels may say more. The novel probably tells us some taste of the “Tao” through the different life choices of several masters, but the movie summed up the truth into one Not quite right. The whole piece looks down, as if the story and “Road ” is two skins, can not fit together. The picture of the film and the state of the martial arts are all very delicate. However, it is precisely the kind of “orthodox” power in Chen’s directing that I feel that his understanding and aura about the “Tao” are really shallow, Can not move people, inspirational enough. After watching the movie I thought that if this film is led by Ang Lee, it should be completely different from another feeling. Of course, I am not in favor of comparison. Everyone is different. And making movies is, in my opinion, really a very difficult one. Director Chen’s “Taoist downhill” shot beautiful, camera language is very smart, the picture is very beautiful, but the weak core, but also can not talk about it.