论文部分内容阅读
一个完善而合理的矿床分类法对确定矿床成因类型、掌握矿床生成的规律性以及解决找矿、勘探的方法来说是非常必要的。能够满足这些要求的分类法只能是成因分类法,而不是别的。 根据成因来进行矿床分类开始於十九世纪末叶,而在本世纪初曾研究出一系列分类法。总的来看,这些方法都是粗糙地将矿床分为原生的和次生的两种,而前者又细分为同生的和後生的。只是由於相近的种学如地质学、地球化学、岩石学、物理化学等巨大发展,而促进了矿床成在理论的逐步深入研究以後,才使得矿床成因分类问题提高了一步。但是这种成因分类法发展过程中,显然存在着资产阶级学者所领导的和苏联学者所提倡的两种迥然不同的学派。在前一个学派中最著名的和影响最大的是林格崙(W.Lindgron)和尼格里(P.Niggli)的成因分类法。
A sound and reasonable deposit classification method is very necessary for determining the type of deposit, grasping the regularity of deposit formation and solving the prospecting and prospecting methods. The taxonomy that satisfies these requirements can only be the cause taxonomy, not anything else. According to genesis, the classification of the deposits began in the late nineteenth century, and a series of taxonomies were developed at the beginning of this century. In general, these methods are crudely divided into two primary and secondary deposits, while the former is subdivided into simultaneous and epigenetic. Only because of the close development of geography, geochemistry, petrology and physical chemistry, which promoted similar development of geology, geology and geochemistry, promoted the further study of geology and mineral deposit, and only made the classification of genesis of geology one step further. However, in the course of the development of this genesis of taxonomy, there are obviously two very different schools of thought led by bourgeois scholars and advocated by Soviet scholars. The most famous and influential of the previous schools are the genealogical classification of W. Lindgron and P. Niggli.