论文部分内容阅读
本刊2004年第1期刊载的文章《虚像是正立的还是倒立的?》(下文简称《虚像正立》),阅后对其中的几处说法不敢苟同,今特提出来讨论. 1.关于话题“对于平面镜、球面镜与透镜形成的虚像,物理课本上不是说’总是正立的’就是说’永远是正立的”’.我查遍所能查得到的课本、资料,还有《中学教师实用物理辞典》,均不见有对虚像的如此表述,所见的只是说“能看到正立的虚像”.不知以上说法从何而
The first article published in the 1st issue of this magazine, “Is the virtual image standing or inverted?” (hereinafter referred to as “virtual image standing upright”), after reading the article did not dare to agree with several of them, this special mention to discuss. About the topic “For virtual images formed by plane mirrors, spherical mirrors, and lenses, the physics textbooks don’t say ’always upright.’ That is, ’everything is standing upright’’. I have searched for textbooks, materials, and The Secondary School Teacher’s Dictionary of Practical Physics did not have such a representation of virtual images. What I saw was just to say ”I can see the virtual image of standing."