对于诗歌研究方法的讨论,既是为总结诗歌创作实践经验和探寻诗歌发展的内在规律所必需,又预示着诗歌更大的发展和繁荣。说起研究方法,古今中外,恐怕没有哪一种文学样式能比诗歌的研究方法更丰富、更蔚为大观的了。在中国,从春秋时代的孔子到晚清的王国维,在外国,从古希腊的德谟克利特到十九世纪俄国的别林斯基,都对诗歌研究方法提出了自己的见解和主张。至于现代和当代,诗歌研究的新方法就更多了。在当前有关诗歌研究方法的讨论中,有的主张仍然要采用以中国古代文论为主的传统的诗歌研究方法,而排斥一切新方法;有 The discussion on the research methods of poetry is not only necessary for summing up the practical experience of poetry writing and exploring the inherent law of the development of poetry, but also indicates the greater development and prosperity of poetry. Speaking of research methods, ancient and modern, I am afraid that no one kind of literary style than poetry research methods more abundant, more spectacular. In China, from the Confucius in the Spring and Autumn Period to the late Qing Dynasty’s Wang Guowei and in foreign countries, from Democritus in ancient Greece to Belinsky in Russia in the 19th century, they all put forward their opinions and propositions on the research methods of poetry. As for the modern and contemporary, there are even more new ways of studying poetry. In the current discussion on the research methods of poetry, some advocates still need to adopt the traditional methods of poetry that mainly focus on ancient Chinese literary theory, and reject all new methods. There are