论文部分内容阅读
近来阅读中国高等院校美术专业系列教材《中国现代书法史》,有个疑惑:作为现代书法史,竟然没有提到毛体书法,并且对启功的书法也只是一笔带过。毛体书法在现代书法史上到底有什么样的意义,在整个中国书法史上又有什么样的意义,这值得研究。毛体书法走出碑学帖学的狭隘书法取法界定,而从本真的主体状态与精神意义上直入书法的最高状态,对今天完全以取法来衡定一个书家的成就是否有偏颇,甚至
Recently read the Chinese art colleges and universities professional series of textbooks “History of Modern Chinese Calligraphy”, there is a doubt: as a modern history of calligraphy, Mao did not even mentioned the calligraphy, and calligraphy Kai is only a passing. What is the significance of Mao’s calligraphy in the history of modern calligraphy and what is the significance in the history of Chinese calligraphy, which is worth studying. Mao calligraphy walked out of the narrow calligraphic study of calligraphy and calligraphy to define the law, and from the true subject and spirit of the highest straight into the highest state of calligraphy, today completely take the law to determine whether a book’s achievements are biased, or even