伴随着国际人权法的发展,医疗保健权是否可以成为一种宪法权利,在各国都有着各自不同的讨论。美国、加拿大、南非是其中较为典型的三个国家,分析探讨这三个国家中,该权利所具有的不同法律地位,进而围绕法院对待医疗保健权的不同态度加以阐释,不仅可以让我们了解该权利的特殊性与复杂性,同时也可对中国现状下该权利的实现以及保障有所启示。 With the development of international human rights law, whether the right to health care can become a constitutional right has its own different discussion in all countries. The United States, Canada and South Africa are the three typical countries. Analyzing and analyzing the legal status of these rights in these three countries and interpreting the different attitudes of the courts toward the right to health care not only allows us to understand The particularity and complexity of rights, as well as enlightenment on the realization and guarantee of this right under the current situation in China.