李本红撰文《编辑审稿中非学术因素及排除之策》指出,学术期刊是学术建设的重要阵地,论文的学术水平在很大程度上决定了学术期刊的质量,必须从学术水平上进行严格把关。这一工作主要是由编辑审稿来实现的,编辑的态度、审稿的程序等都必须以客观公正为原则。然而,受学界评价体系功利化的影响,目前学术期刊的编辑审稿工作受到诸多非学术因素 According to Li Benhong's article, “Academic Review of Manuscripts in China and Africa”, it is pointed out that academic journals are an important front for academic construction. The academic quality of academic journals largely determines the quality of academic journals and must be rigorously regulated at the academic level . This work is mainly achieved by editing and reviewing manuscripts. The editors 'attitude and the reviewers' procedures must be based on the principle of objectivity and fairness. However, influenced by the utilitarianism of the academic evaluation system, the current editing and reviewing work of academic journals is influenced by many non-academic factors