论文部分内容阅读
运用汉语四类可逆被动句对正常成人（４５例）、右半球脑血管意外病人（３１例）、左半球脑血管意外无失语病人（２０例）、左半球脑血管意外失语症病人（２０例）进行测验，以了解非语言中枢的脑损伤是否可造成可逆被动句的听理解困难。结果表明，失语症病人与其他三组被试者之间存在差异，只有失语症病人可存在可逆被动句的听理解困难。失语组的四类可逆波动句型听理解之间无差异。感觉性失语、运动性失语、完全性失语三组被试可逆被动句听理解成绩之间无差异。同时，对失语组、对照组、右半球病变组、左半球病变无失语组被试的主动句与可逆被动句听理解比较，表明失语症组的主动句与被动句的听理解有差异，对被动句的理解表现出更大的困难，其余三组主、被动句间无差异。进一步对失语组的可逆被动句与语段听理解进行比较，对可逆被动句的理解较语段的理解更困难。
Four types of reversible passive sentences in Chinese were used to evaluate the effects of four types of reversible passive sentences on normal adults (n = 45), right hemisphere accidental cerebrovascular accident (n = 31), left hemisphere accidental aphasia (n = 20), left hemisphere cerebrovascular accidental aphasia ) To test whether nonverbal brain damage can cause difficulties in understanding reversible passive sentences. The results show that there is a difference between the aphasia patients and the other three groups of subjects, only aphasia patients can exist reversible passive sentences to listen to understand the difficulties. There was no difference between the four types of reversible fluctuation patterns in the aphasia group. Sensory aphasia, aphasia, complete aphasia three subjects reversible passive listening comprehension scores no difference between the results. At the same time, comparison of the active sentence and the reversible passive sentence of the aphasia group, the control group, the right hemisphere lesion group and the left hemisphere lesion-free aphasia group showed that there was a difference in listening comprehension between the active sentence and the passive sentence in the aphasia group. The understanding of passive sentences shows more difficulties, and there is no difference between the other three groups of passive and passive sentences. Further comparison of the reversible passive sentences and the paraphrase comprehension in the aphasia group makes it more difficult to understand the reversible passive sentences than the paraphrase.