《张衡传》中的“机巧”课本注为“指器械制造方面的巧妙”,把“巧”释为形容词“巧妙”了。据此,学生必然将该句译成:“张衡擅长于器械制造方面的巧妙。”显然,这里的“擅长……巧妙”动宾搭配不当。问题出在“巧”的义训上。此“巧”不是“巧妙”之“巧 The “clever” textbook in “Zhang Heng Chuan” is annotated as “cleverness in the manufacture of instruments,” and “cleverness” is interpreted as the adjective “ingenious.” Accordingly, the student must interpret this sentence as: “Zhang Heng is good at the ingenuity of the apparatus manufacture.” Apparently, the “good at cleverness” in this case is improperly matched. The problem lies in the “clever” sense training. This “clever” is not “clever” of the clever