论文部分内容阅读
学习法国作家雨果的小说《“诺曼底”号遇险记》时,刚讲读完课文,一名学生提出了一个令人始料不及的问题,针对第19自然段阿尔威船长与洛克机械师的对话:“炉子怎么样了?”“海水淹了。”“火呢?”“灭了。”学生质疑:“炉子淹了,火当然灭了,后面这句话是不是多余的?”面对学生提出的问题,老师立即组织学生讨论。一位学生反驳道:“像雨果这样的大作家,怎么会语言啰嗦,这不是多余的,可能在别的地方还保留着火种。”这时,有1/3的学生
When I read the French writer Hugo novel Normandy distress, just finished reading the text, a student raised an unexpected problem, for the first 19 natural paragraph Captain Alves and Locke Machinery Teacher’s Talk: “How is the stove?” “The sea is flooded.” “The fire?” “Extinguished.” “The student questioned:” The stove flooded, and the fire went out, of course, This sentence is not superfluous? “In the face of student questions, the teacher immediately organized student discussions. One student retorted: ”It’s not superfluous how great writers such as Hugo are, and it may not be superfluous, but they may still have a fire elsewhere.“ ”One in three students