论文部分内容阅读
当美国等发达国家正在质疑职业经理的巨额收入是否是“对文明世界的掠夺”的时候,我们仍然不得不为职业经理的收入是否体现其真正价值而争论。收入的太多和收入的太少并不是社会制度的本质区别,而是由于各自所处的经济发展阶段的不同。股票期权制度在美国出现之前,美国等发达国家的职业经理收入虽然比一般阶层高,但并未体现职业经理的贡献,直到1950年9月23日,美国国会通过了《1950年收入法案》把期权安排合法化,职业经理才进入了高额收入的时代。
When the developed countries such as the United States are questioning whether the huge income of professional managers is “plundering the civilized world,” we still have to debate whether the income of professional managers reflects their true value. Too much income and too little income are not the essential differences between social systems, but rather due to the different stages of economic development in which they are located. Before the advent of the stock option system in the United States, professional managers in the developed countries such as the United States, although higher than the general class, did not reflect the contribution of professional managers until September 23, 1950, when the U.S. Congress passed the Revenue Act 1950 Legitimate options arrangements, professional managers entered the era of high income.