论文部分内容阅读
目的:对乳腺癌根治术中吸入麻醉与全凭静脉麻醉的效果进行比较。方法:选取2013年6月~12月间于我院进行乳腺癌根治术的患者60例,随机分为吸入麻醉组和静脉麻醉组两组,分别采取吸入麻醉和全凭静脉麻醉处理。后对两组患者临床效果进行分析比较。结果:两组患者临床麻醉效果无明显差异,p>0.05,但静脉麻醉组中患者恶心、烦躁及哭闹等不良反应发生率较低,过度镇静发生率较高,p<0.05。结论:给予乳腺癌根治术患者吸入麻醉与全凭静脉麻醉均有较好临床意义,临床上应根据患者具体情况进行麻醉方式的选择。
Objective: To compare the effects of inhalation anesthesia and total intravenous anesthesia in radical mastectomy of breast cancer. Methods: Sixty patients with radical mastectomy in our hospital from June 2013 to December were randomly divided into inhalation anesthesia group and intravenous anesthesia group, and inhaled anesthesia and total intravenous anesthesia respectively. After the two groups of patients clinical analysis and comparison. Results: There was no significant difference in clinical anesthesia between the two groups (p> 0.05). However, the rates of nausea, irritability, crying and other adverse reactions in the intravenous anesthesia group were lower, and the incidence of over-sedation was higher (p <0.05). Conclusion: The patients given radical mastectomy inhaled anesthesia and total intravenous anesthesia have a good clinical significance, clinical choice of anesthesia should be based on the specific circumstances of patients.