论文部分内容阅读
我 国对举世闻名的秦陵地宫进行了首次勘探发掘 ,巨大收获之外还有一个科学发现的副产品———项羽并未焚烧阿房宫 ,但咸阳宫毁于大火却是事实。或问 :“既然没烧阿房宫 ,是不是该给项羽的残暴恶名辩辩诬呢?”笔者的回答是否定的。为什么呢?司马迁的《项羽本纪》写道 :“项羽引
Our country conducted the first exploration and excavation on the world-famous Qinling underground palace. There was also a scientific discovery by-product --- Xiang Yu did not burn A Fanggong besides the great harvest, but it was a fact that Xianyang Palace was destroyed in a fire. Or asked: “Since there is no burning Afong Palace, it is not to Xiang Yu’s cruel fame defame?” The author’s answer is no. Why? Sima Qian’s “Xiang Yu Benji” wrote: "Xiang Yu cited