学者常停留于库恩范式多重语义的基础上解释马克思哲学,往往导致对其解释陷入一种相对性状况。在反思这种现象的基础上,回归库恩思想的变化,认识到范式的本真内涵和方法论意义在于,揭示了理论是在内、外部因素共同作用的基础上以一种异质性的方式发展。这对批判以往学者将马克思哲学简单地断定为“连续说”或“断裂说”具有启发意义。在此基础上,用范式理论解释马克思哲学变革,至少应包含哲学思维方式、研究视角及价值诉求三重维度的转变。 Scholars often stay on the basis of Kuhn’s paradigm multiple semantics to explain Marx’s philosophy, which often results in a situation of relative relativity. On the basis of rethinking this kind of phenomenon, we can return to the change of Kuhn’s thought, recognize that the true connotation and methodological significance of the paradigm lie in revealing that the theory is a heterogeneous way based on the interaction of internal and external factors development of. It is instructive to criticize the scholars in the past simply to determine Marxist philosophy as “continuous” or “broken”. On this basis, the explanation of Marxist philosophical changes by paradigmatic theory should at least include the transformation of the three dimensions of philosophical thinking, research perspectives and value appeals.