论文部分内容阅读
2010年11月5日下午,台湾大学文学院副院长、教授、博士生导师黄慕萱女士与林奇秀老师作了以“国际合作及不同计量方法在国家科研影响力评估中的影响”为题的学术报告。众所周知,发文量和被引频次是科学评价中两个重要的指标,在对这两个指标进行计量时,如果采用不同的统计方法,所生成的评价结果会存在很大的差别。在统计合著论文时,主要有四种方法,第一
On the afternoon of November 5, 2010, Ms. Huang Muxuan, a professor and doctoral tutor at the Associate Dean, Professor and PhD supervisor of National Taiwan University of Literature, made a speech titled “The Impact of International Cooperation and Different Metrological Methods in the Assessment of National Research Impact” Academic report. It is known to all that the quantity of published papers and the number of times cited are two important indicators in scientific evaluation. If we adopt different statistical methods in the measurement of these two indicators, the results of evaluation will be greatly different. There are four main methods in the statistical co-authored paper, first