人们忌讳小题大作,称它为无病呻吟,是否大题可以大作呢?笔者以为,在新闻报道上,大题也不一定大作。 道理很明显,新闻的要求是一事一报,简洁明快,它既不同于评书可以云天雾地拉扯,也不象搞总结可以面面俱到,它要受到篇幅的局限和特性的制约。只有抓住大题中闪光的侧面,小处着笔,才能立意新鲜,主题集中,叙事论理才能够透辟,给人启发。反之,如果因为典型好,方面多,或单位大,牌子响,就大题大作, People taboo little masterpiece, saying it moan groan, whether the big problem can be made? I think, in the news, the big problem is not necessarily masterpiece. The reason is obvious. The requirement of news is one thing, one is simple, and the other is simple and neat. It differs from the storytelling in that it can be pulled by the clouds and clouds, or it can be exhaustive as it may be summed up. It is subject to the limitations and characteristics of space. Only by grasping the flasher side of the big topic and writing the same thing in order to be able to make a fresh proposal and focus on the subject can the narrative theory be thoroughly inspired and inspired. On the contrary, if because of the typical good, many aspects, or large units, brand name ring, on the big problem,