论文部分内容阅读
现在,用投票表决的事情多起来了,看看近期的报纸,工程用“票决”,选干部用“票决”,要群众掏腰包也用“票决”,“票决制”似乎成了无所不能的灵丹妙药。“票决制”的流行。应该说是我国基层民主政治建设的一大进步,它与由少数人凭长官意志拍板决策比,有一个质的飞跃,毕竟它带有一定程度的人民性,是还政于民的一种形式,与“没有不同意见请鼓掌通过”相比,更关注个体的存在价值。人民群众也从票决制的运作过程中感受到了当家作主的滋味,如村委会直选等。当然,“票决制”绝非新世纪产物,更非完美无缺。追溯它的历史,早在奴隶制时期就已有之,古希腊哲学家苏格拉底抗是以类似“票决制”的形式被处死的.对此,马克思
At present, there are more things that have been voted on. Looking at the recent newspapers, the project uses “votes” and elects cadres to use “votes”. It also seems that people want to spend their money in “votes” and “voting decisions” Omnipotence is a panacea. “Voting system” popular. It should be said that China’s grassroots-level democratic construction has made a big step forward. It is a qualitative leap compared with the decision-making by the minority with the will of the executive. After all, it has a certain degree of people’s character and is a form of government for the people , Compared with “applauding without dissent”, pay more attention to the existence value of individual. The people also felt the taste of being masters of the country from the operation of the vote system, such as the direct election of village committees. Of course, “voting system” is by no means the product of the new century, but more imperfect. Tracing back to its history, as early as the slavery period, the ancient Greek philosopher Socrates was executed in the form of a similar “vote system.” In this regard, Marx