论文部分内容阅读
目的了解医疗机构的消毒质量,为采取相应改进措施提供依据。方法抽取不同级别医疗机构18家,对其室内空气、医务人员手、压力蒸汽灭菌效果及污水进行采样检测,分析原因,提出整改意见,3个月后进行复检,并比较分析2次检测结果。结果首次监测合格率为84.3%,经整改后复检,合格率为96.4%,二者比较有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论医院消毒质量较社区及诊所有明显优势;提高医院感染管理水平和普及消毒技术知识等措施,缩小了医院与社区及诊所之间的差距,能够大幅度提高医疗机构的消毒质量。
Objective To understand the quality of disinfection in medical institutions, to provide the basis for the corresponding improvement measures. Methods Totally 18 medical institutions at different levels were selected to sample and test indoor air, medical staffs, pressure steam sterilization effect and sewage. The causes were analyzed and suggestions for rectification were put forward. After 3 months, re-examination was carried out and comparative analysis of 2 tests result. Results The first pass rate was 84.3%. After revising, the pass rate was 96.4%. There was a significant difference between the two (P <0.05). Conclusion The hospital disinfection quality has obvious advantages over the community and clinics. Measures such as improving the level of hospital infection management and popularizing disinfection technical knowledge have narrowed the gap between hospitals and communities and clinics and can greatly improve the disinfection quality of medical institutions.