论文部分内容阅读
2012年5月最高法公布关于反垄断私人诉讼的解释为我国反垄断私人诉讼的发展提供了一定的可操作性,比如在原告的确定、原告举证能力的增强、公力实施和私力实施的衔接与协助等方面都设置相关的规定,但同时这进步程度上,这个规定的意义还是有限的,诸如证据制度和激励制度等很多世界上较为先进的制度的细化操作还有待于理论和立法实践的进步。
In May 2012, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate released its interpretation on the antitrust private litigation, which provided some maneuverability for the development of antitrust private litigation in our country. For example, when the plaintiff was confirmed, the plaintiff’s ability to increase the burden of proof, the implementation of the public and the private But the meanings of this provision are still limited. The elaboration of many of the more advanced systems in the world, such as the system of evidence and the system of incentives, remains to be worked out in theory and legislation Practical progress.