索财型“绑架”在司法实践中广为发生。首先,必须对案件的性质作出分析,确认其是否存在债务,以决定能否适用司法解释的规定,但同时也不能简单地以司法解释有规定为由,直接认定为非法拘禁罪,而应该具体地去分析数额问题,从客观行为样态推定行为人的主观目的,如果与实际数额相差较大的,可以反映其勒索财物为目的的,应当认定为绑架罪,以正确适用刑法。此外,在此类案件中,如涉及共犯问题的,要根据相关刑法法理处理重合性和承继性的问题。 Cable type “kidnapping ” occurred in judicial practice. First of all, the nature of the case must be analyzed to determine whether there is a debt, to determine whether the provisions applicable to judicial interpretation, but can not simply be justified by judicial interpretation, directly identified as illegal detention, but should be specific To analyze the issue of amount, it is presumed that the subjective purpose of the perpetrator from the objective behavioral pattern, if there is a large difference with the actual amount, can reflect the extortion of property, and should be affirmed as kidnapping to correctly apply the criminal law. In addition, in such cases, such as those involving accomplice, the issue of coincidence and inheritance should be dealt with in accordance with the relevant criminal law and jurisprudence.