论文部分内容阅读
对法律哲学发展所做出的历史解释是罗斯科.庞德在其著作中提出法律的社会工程学解释和建构其庞大的社会法学理论的前提性预设。而庞德本人也在这一过程中实现了其在宏大叙事下的点滴努力。然而遗憾的是,这一方法却在过去的几十年里始终由于种种的原因而被研究者们所忽视。文中,作者采取一种思辨性的研究方法和一种批判性的研究进路来研究和审视一下庞德的这种历史解释方法以及其由此所考察的法律哲学的发展历程。写作目的不仅仅在于寻找和发现庞德法律哲学历史观的内在规律性和其理论脉络的转出以及其本身所固有的缺陷,更在乎寻找出对其理论进行知识增量意义上发展的可能性路径并揭示出其理论内涵对于当下中国法治建设所具有的问题意义。
The historical explanation of the development of legal philosophy is that Roscoe Pound put forward the presupposition of social engineering of law and the construction of its huge theory of social law in his book. And Pound himself also in the process of achieving its ambitious efforts under the grand narrative. Unfortunately, however, this method has been ignored by researchers for a variety of reasons over the past few decades. In this paper, the author adopts a kind of speculative research method and a critical research approach to study and examine Pound’s this historical explanation method and the development process of the legal philosophy which it explores. The purpose of writing is not only to find out and find out the inner regularity of Pound’s philosophy of history philosophy and the transfer of its theoretical thread as well as its inherent flaws, but also to find out the possibility of its theory’s incremental development in knowledge It also reveals the significance of its theoretical connotation to the current problems of the construction of the rule of law in China.