针对我国人民陪审员制度目前面临的“陪而不审”、“审而不议”之现状,本文以我国人民陪审员制度存在的问题为视角,在阐述两大法系国家陪审制度的基础上,比较分析了西方陪审团制度的运行模式,从而指出裁判权力相分离的嬗变历程,对于中国当前的人民陪审制度改革具有重要的意义和研究价值。为此,根据我国的实际情况,借鉴两大法系的陪审制度,建立科学、合理的裁判制约机制,实现人民陪审员制度分权机制构建。 In view of the status quo that the people’s juror system in our country is currently facing “trial without trial” and “trial without reviewing”, this article takes the existing problems of the people’s jury system in our country as the angle of view, Based on the comparative analysis of the operation mode of the western jury system, it points out that the transmutation process of the separation of powers of the judicial power has important significance and research value for the current reform of the people’s jury system in China. To this end, according to the actual situation in our country, learn from the jury system of the two major legal systems, establish a scientific and reasonable mechanism of referee restriction, and establish the decentralization mechanism of the people’s jury system.