论文部分内容阅读
如果杨剑波所谓“真相”属实,作为监管机构的上海证监局、上交所、中金所就负有不可推卸的责任。随着当事人之一杨剑波诉证监会案4月3日开庭,时隔半年多的光大证券乌龙事件(“8·16”事件)重新成为舆论焦点。发生在证券市场的这场“秋菊打官司”会有怎样的结果,目前还不得而知。监管层对于“内幕信息”引发业界讨论,也暴露出我国《证券法》存在的滞后性。
If Yang Jianbo so-called “truth ” is true, as the regulatory body of Shanghai Securities Regulatory Bureau, Shanghai Stock Exchange, CICC has an unshirkable responsibility. With one of the parties Yang Jianbo v. The SFC hearing on April 3, the Everbright Securities Oolong incident (“August 16” incident), which lasted more than six months, has once again become the focus of public opinion. In the stock market this “Qiu Ju litigation ” what will happen, it is still unknown. Regulators raised the industry’s discussion about “insider information” and also exposed the lagging nature of the “securities law” in our country.