论文部分内容阅读
目的：探讨男性尿失禁患者留置导尿与使用保鲜袋接尿并发症发生率对比，研究更适合男性尿失禁患者接尿方法。方法回顾我院综合病房2012年5月1日~2013年9月30日就诊男性尿失禁患100例，按入院时间分为观察组与对照组50例，观察组应用保鲜袋接尿法，对照组应用留置导尿。结果通过1个月观察期间，两组并发症对比，观察组尿道感染与阴茎糜烂、管道脱落、漏尿、4 w总费用、患者满意度有显著差异，差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。结论男性尿失禁患者使用保鲜袋接尿方法避免了有创留置导尿，并减少了导管相关性尿路感染的发生率，减轻患者痛苦与经济负担，同时减少了漏尿与皮肤损伤的问题，提高了患者舒适度，方便可行，是与家庭护理紧密衔接的方法，值得在长期卧床尿失禁患者中普遍采用。“,”Objective An investigate and comparison of male urinary incontinence patient detaining catheterization and Health complication occur ence rate using plastic bag urinary system. Developing a bet er urinary system. Methods Reviewing 100 male urinary incontinence patients who received treatment in our comprehensive ward buildings during 1th of May 2012 to 30th of September 2013, two groups (observation group and control group) of 50 cases are divided according to admission time of which observation group take plastic bag urinary system and control group car y on detaining catheterization. Results During one month observation and comparison of two groups health complication, they have remarkable dif erence in terms of urethra infection and penis erosion, catheter detachment,urine leakage, 4 weeks total cost and patient satisfaction. The dif erence is of statistic significance ( <0.05). Conclusion Male urinary incontinence patient using plastic bag urinary system avoids invasive urinary catheterization, reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infection rate, reliving suf erings and economic burden of patients, meanwhile reducing urine leakage and skin damage and improving patient comfort. It is convenient and feasible and is closely-related with home care and is worthful of using in the bedridden incontinence patients extensively.