乒坛老将李富荣有一句名言,“不允许出现‘运动员培养教练员’的现象”。乍一听,此话似觉多余,运动员怎么能去培养教练员呢? 细究一下,此话却另有深意,且意在言外。事实上,运动员培养教练员的例子并不鲜见。有些运动员,以自我为中心,要求教练员按他的要求制定训练计划,确定运动量和训练方式、方法等。而教练员也觉得自己不过是个当“婆婆”的角色,如今讲民主,何必与“媳妇”过不去.况且,取得成绩走上领奖台的还是“媳妇”,又不是“婆婆”,于是便成了教练员围着运动员的指挥棒转,教练员形同虚设,顶多是个保姆而已。 举一反三。这样的事例决不限于体育界。宏观至一个国家,中观至一个单位,微观至一个家庭,都必须如此。过硬的教练员应是能够掌握科学的理论指导、正确的训练方法、严格的管理手段等等要素的人。这几项要素中,第一是科学的理论指导,什么是科学的理论?实践是检验真理的唯一标准,只要是有利于发展的,有利于提高成绩的理论就是科学的。第二是训练方法要得当。比如因人制宜、因时制宜等。第三是管理要严格。 Ping Fong veteran Li Furong has a famous saying, “does not allow ’athletes to train coaches’ phenomenon.” At first glance, this remark seems to be superfluous, athletes how to train coaches? Careful, this remark is another meaning, and intended to make words. In fact, it is not uncommon for athletes to train coaches. Some athletes, self-centered, require coaches to develop training plans at his request, to determine the amount of exercise and training methods and methods. And coaches also feel that they are only a “mother-in-law” role, and now talk about democracy, why do not go with the “daughter-in-law.” Moreover, the achievements of the podium to go or “daughter-in-law” nor “mother-in-law” Coaches turn around the baton athletes, coaches nothing, at most, it is a nanny. learn by analogy. Such cases are by no means limited to sports. This must be the case from the macroscopic perspective to a country, a medium perspective to a single unit, and from a microcosmic perspective to a single family. Excellent coaches should be able to master the theoretical guidance of science, the correct training methods, strict management tools and so on people. Among these elements, the first is the theoretical guidance of science. What is a scientific theory? Practice is the sole criterion for testing truth. As long as it is conducive to development, the theory conducive to improving academic performance is scientific. The second is to train properly. For example, due to personal needs, due to the time limit and so on. The third is to manage strictly.