论文部分内容阅读
7月23日北京日报第13版“教育周刊”以《媒体报道案件,无权进行“审判”》为题,对普遍存在的“媒体审判”现象进行了分析,是一篇概念清楚,分析透彻的好文章。 审判是法院的专属权利。文章将媒体对未审结案件发布有倾向性的报道定性为“干预司法”。指出,媒体有新闻报道权,但无“审判权”。某些媒体的行为不仅干预了司法审判,而且侵犯了当事人的合法权利。文章指出,即使是犯了重罪的
On July 23rd, Beijing Education Daily, the 13th edition of Education Week, made an analysis of the phenomenon of “media trial” prevailing in the media on the subject of “media coverage without the right to conduct” the trial. This is a clear and well-understood analysis Good article. Trial is the exclusive right of the court. The article defined the media as “intervention in judiciary”. Pointed out that the media has the right to news coverage, but no “right to trial.” The conduct of certain media not only interferes with judicial proceedings but also infringes on the legitimate rights of the parties involved. The article points out that even a felony was committed