论文部分内容阅读
有这样一幅漫画:一花一白两只猫,都睁一只眼,瞅着一只老鼠在掘粮屯:闭一只眼,猜想对方肯定会去抓那只正在作恶的老鼠。谁也没有半点动手的意思,以致孤鼠对双猫,竟毫无惧色,放手掘屯掏粮。这幅漫画的题目是:“1+1=?”“1+1=?”这是一道简单得没有再简单的算术题,多数学龄前儿童都能准确无误地给出答案,可是作为一个群体心理问题,却是一道众说纷纭的“歌德巴赫猜想。”有人认为,人多好做工,蚁多困死虫;一人锄地一条线,众人锄地一大片;三个臭皮匠,顶个诸葛亮,等等,这可谓“人多力量大”论。持反对意见的则认为,人多不洗碗,鸭多不生卵;一个和尚挑水吃,两个和尚抬水吃,三个和尚没
There is such a comic: a flower and a white two cats, eyes open, looking at a mouse dig in Tun Tun: one eye, guess the other side will certainly catch that mouse is doing evil. No one who hands the meaning of the slightest, so that the two pairs of cats on the mouse, actually no fear, let go Tuen Tun dig grain. The comic’s title is: “This is a simple, no more simple arithmetic, most preschoolers are able to give an accurate answer, However, as a group of psychological problems, it is a controversial ”Goethebger conjecture.“ Some people think that people are more good work, ants are more sleepy insects; one hoe to a line, everyone hoe to a large; three Stooges , The top Zhuge Liang, and so on, this can be described as ”people more power" theory. Opponents of the view that many people do not wash the bowl, the duck does not lay eggs; a monk carrying water to eat, two monks carrying water to eat, the three monks did not