论文部分内容阅读
《侵权责任法》第87条对侵权人不明的高楼落物侵权责任的承担进行了规定,该条规定具有保障受害人得到补偿、统一司法实践、降低致害概率的积极意义,但也存在许多不足之处,主要表现为不利于社会和谐、容易引发道德风险、预防功能不充分、适用前提不明确等问题,没有很好解决高楼落物侵权所面临的困境。笔者认为采取社会救济、高楼落物赔偿基金、保险赔偿等多种途径相结合的救济方式,并在《侵权责任法》中增加惩罚性赔偿制度,这样不仅可以使受害人得到较好的、充分的补偿,而且可以有效预防此类侵权损害的发生。
Article 87 of the Tort Liability Act stipulates the assumption of the infringement liability of the infringer’s unclear high-rise buildings, which stipulates the positive meaning of protecting the victims’ compensation, unifying the judicial practice and reducing the probability of causing harm, but there are also many The inadequacies are mainly not conducive to social harmony, easy to lead to moral hazard, inadequate preventive function, the application of the premise is not clear and so on, did not solve the plight of high buildings litigation. The author thinks that remedies such as social relief, compensation fund for falling buildings, insurance compensation and many other ways are combined, and the punitive damages system is added in “Tort Liability Law”, which not only can make the victims get better and sufficient Compensation, but also can effectively prevent the occurrence of such infringement damage.