论文部分内容阅读
我和苏凤结交时,我们都在锦瑟年华。他年事大于我,已是卓有声誉的作家和报刊编辑了,而我还仅是一个毛头小伙子大学生。我们当年意气风发,都没设想到人生易老。我更未料及今天会执笔给他写悼念文字,虽然今天他已经离开人间二十年了。我结识苏凤是在1933年2月间。那时,他主编上海《晨报·每日电影》(以下简称《每电》)。在中共文委直辖的“电影小组”的领导下。左翼“剧联”的“影评人小组”几乎占领了上海大部分报纸的电影副刊。首先是《电影时报》的影评强调意识形态,后来受到官方的压力,被迫改变调门,以“吃豆腐”迎合小市民胃口。这个副刊的编者滕某本人就是油腔滑
When I made a deal with Su Feng, we were all in good time. He was older than me and was a reputable writer and newspaper editor, and I was still just a fellow collegeboy. When we were high-spirited, we did not expect that life would be easy to get old. I did not even anticipate that I will write a memento today for writing, although today he has left the world for twenty years. I met Su Feng in February 1933. At that time, he was the editor of Shanghai Morning Post Daily Movie (hereinafter referred to as “Per Power”). Under the leadership of the “Film Team” under the direct jurisdiction of the Chinese Communist Party Central Committee. The Left Wing “Drama Alliance” “Critics’ Group” occupied almost the movie supplement for most newspapers in Shanghai. First of all, Film Times’s film reviews emphasize ideology, and later under official pressure, it was forced to change its tone to “eat tofu” to cater to the appetite of the common people. Tengmou editor of this supplement I own is sliding