论文部分内容阅读
近年来受西方中心论的影响,人们习惯将各个领域按照西方的观念来衡量,附合西方观念的为对,不附合西方观念的为错。并将其格式化、规范化,凡不附合此格式、规范的,均斥之为“旁门左道”。这种风气在政治、经济、文化领域是这样,在科学领域中也是这样。这实际上是一个禁锢人们思维的大网,亟需打破。科学研究的对象是自然(这是广义的自然——包括宇宙万物、生物、人类、人类社会及精神、思维领域),自然界是千姿百态的,是不能用格式、规范约束的,任何将自然界简化为典型模式的,都只能是近似的、有假设条件的、不准确的。西方(笛卡尔及牛顿的)科学观,用典型模式、数理逻辑、线性分析、可重复性实验等手段,虽然使经典科学上了一个台阶,但却揭示不了自然
In recent years, under the influence of Western centralism, people are accustomed to measuring their attitudes in all fields in accordance with the Western concept, adhering to the Western concept, and not adhering to the Western concept. And its formatting, standardization, who do not attach this format, norms, are denounced as . This culture is the case in the political, economic and cultural fields, as well as in the scientific field. This is in fact a big net that hinders people's thinking and needs to be broken urgently. The object of scientific research is nature (which is a broad sense of nature - including all things in the universe, biology, human beings, human society, spirit, and thinking). Nature is a mixture of different forms and forms. Nor can any nature be reduced to The typical model, can only be approximate, there are assumptions, inaccurate. Western (Descartes and Newtonian) views of science, with typical models, mathematical logic, linear analysis, and repeatability experiments, can not reveal the natural