论文部分内容阅读
在近代的化学与物理书籍中用e~-代表电子,e~+代表正子,e代表电子带有电量的绝对值即4.805×10~(10)静电单位.已经成为一种惯例了,能够在一般化学书中推行这种惯例是好的,因为这样可以减少许多不必要的混乱,尤其对于刚在走进化学科学的大门的学生群关系更大。不过一个惯例比不得那些不随人们的意志转移的客观规律,却是人为的东西,如果在某种情形下更动了它更方便时是完全可以更动它的。就问询中提出的黄仕永译的半微量定性分析一书来说,如果原作者要用e而不用e~-来代表电子,还是有他一定的理由的,因为在定性
In modern chemistry and physics books using e ~ - for the electron, e ~ + for the normal, e on behalf of the electron with the absolute value of the charge that is 4.805 × 10 ~ (10) units of static electricity has become a practice, able to It is good practice to implement this convention in the General Chemistry Book, because this reduces many unnecessary confusion, especially for students who are just entering the chemical sciences. However, an objective law is more objective than an objective law that does not follow the will of the people. It can be completely changed if it is more convenient in some circumstances. As for the semi-quantitative qualitative analysis translated by Huang Shi-yong in his inquiry, if the original author wanted to use e instead of e- to represent electrons, he still had some reason for it.