关于盘古的来历,向来有“本土说”和“外来说”。但双方在对基本史料的研读和对背景知识的联贯上都还存在某些缺憾。通过对几条关键性史料重加辨析,我认为所谓“盘古图”出于东汉末的说法并不可靠,盘古神话在文献中出现的时间,目前所知最早为公元222年。在两汉的普遍信仰世界中,中国本土自有承担开辟和创造任务的大神,盘古并非自古以来的中国本土开辟之神。盘古神话从汉末三国到唐代自有其发展的阶段性。其中的某些“外来”因素,是在汉末三国至隋唐时陆续加入的。 On the origins of Pangu, there have always been “indigenous” and “outside”. However, both sides still have some shortcomings in the study of basic historical materials and in the connection of background knowledge. Through the analysis of several key historical materials, I think the so-called “Pangu Figure” is not reliable from the end of the Eastern Han Dynasty. The time that the Pangu myth appeared in the literature is currently known as 222 AD. In the universal belief world of the Han and Han dynasties, the Chinese mainland took on itself the great god who opened up and created the task. Pangu was not the god of the Chinese mainland since ancient times. Pangu myth from the late Han Dynasty to the Tang Dynasty its own stage of development. Some of these “foreign” factors were gradually added from the late Han, the Three Kingdoms to the Sui and Tang dynasties.