论文部分内容阅读
2005年1月1日,纺织品贸易配额在世界范围内取消。我国纺织品出口实现较大幅度的增长。与此同时,欧美频繁利用《中国加入WTO工作组报告书》中第242段(以下简称“第242段”)的规定,相继对我国多种纺织品进行调查、设限。本文以中美纺织品贸易争端为例,比照保障措施条款从实施原则、实施要件和程序要件三个方面对美国对华纺织品特殊保障措施进行比较分析,阐述其差异。
January 1, 2005, textile trade quotas in the world canceled. China’s textile exports to achieve more substantial growth. In the meantime, Europe and the United States have frequently used the provisions of paragraph 242 of the “Report of China’s Accession to the WTO” (hereinafter referred to as “paragraph 242”) to successively investigate and set limits on various textile products in China. This article takes the Sino-U.S. Textile trade dispute as an example, compares and analyzes the special safeguard measures of the United States to China textiles from the aspects of implementation principles, implementation requirements and procedural requirements with reference to the provisions of safeguard measures.