论文部分内容阅读
因为多年研究董仲舒,所以也阅读、研究董仲舒的著作和文章,发现一些值得探讨的方法论问题。一实事求是地对待史料《史记·儒林列传》的最后一篇是董仲舒传,没有记载董仲舒的生卒之年,需要研究者探讨。清代学者苏舆著有《春秋繁露义证》,有较高水平。因此,苏舆就被学界视为董仲舒研究的权威。书前有董子年表,将董子生年系于汉文帝元年,卒年是在汉武帝太初元年,即公元前179—公
After many years of research on Dong Zhongshu, I also read and studied Dong Zhongshu’s writings and articles, and found some worthwhile methodological issues to be explored. A truth-seeking treatment of historical data “Historical Records · Rulin biography” the last one is Dongzhong Shu Biography, Dong Zhongshu did not record the year of birth and death, need researchers to explore. Su Yu, a scholar of the Qing Dynasty, had “Spring and Autumn Fanny Testimony,” a higher level. Therefore, Su Yu was the academic community as Dong Zhongshu study authority. There are books in front of the book chronology, the Department of Chinese in Dong Dasheng Department of the first year of Emperor, died in the early years of the Emperor Wudi, namely 179-