论文部分内容阅读
目的:本文的目的是研究出局部浸润、经皮神经电刺激和椎旁阻滞治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的治疗效果。方法:是抽取60例患有顽固性带状疱疹后神经痛的患者作为本次的研究对象,按治疗方式将其分成观察、对比两组,观察组患者采用局部浸润、椎旁阻滞及经皮神经电刺激的综合治疗方式,对比组患者接受局部浸润和椎旁阻滞的治疗方式。采用VAS评分及睡眠质量评分来评定患者的治疗效果。结果:患者治疗一周到三周后的VAS评分与睡眠质量评分均较之前有明显的改善(P<0.01),且观察组患者治疗之后的睡眠质量评分、VAS评分及治疗显效率要优于对比组(P<0.05)。结论:两种治疗形式对治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的疗效显著,且综合治疗法对患者的疼痛缓解及睡眠质量的改善要比神经阻滞治疗法的效果好。
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the therapeutic effect of local infiltration, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and paravertebral block on post-herpetic neuralgia. Methods: Sixty patients with intractable postherpetic neuralgia were enrolled in this study. According to the treatment, they were divided into two groups. The patients in the observation group were treated with local infiltration, paravertebral block, Comprehensive treatment of electrical stimulation of the skin nerve, the control group received partial infiltration and paravertebral block treatment. The VAS score and sleep quality score were used to assess the patient’s treatment. Results: The VAS score and sleep quality score of patients from one week to three weeks after treatment were significantly improved (P <0.01), and the sleep quality score, VAS score and treatment effective rate in the observation group were better than those in the control group Group (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The two forms of treatment have shown significant efficacy in the treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia, and the combination therapy is more effective in relieving pain and improving sleep quality in patients with neurological blockade.